An Employer’s Guide to Employees and Independent Contractors

Print Friendly

When you hire a worker, should you hire him or her as an employee or an independent contractor?

This choice is not simply a matter of title. The Internal Revenue Service and other regulators have created a legal framework specifying the differences between the two types of worker. Employers must understand the legal differences, as well as the benefits and drawbacks, before making a choice.

Employees vs. Independent Contractors: the Law
Over the past 40 years, Congress has passed several laws outlining the distinctions between employees and independent contractors with regards to their compensation, benefits and relationships to their employers. Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 laid the initial groundwork for the regulations we follow today.

The IRS sets three basic requirements: 1. a reasonable basis for treating the workers as independent contractors, 2. consistency in the way such workers were treated and 3. proper tax reporting using Form 1099 for those categorized as contractors. Subsequent legislation, such as the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, further clarified the language in Section 530.

Many employers use the following rule of thumb to distinguish between a contractor and an employee: if an employer has the right to control both the means by which the worker performs his or her services as well as the end product, the worker is considered an employee. But this guideline is very broad. In 1987, the IRS released a 20-factor list, based on prior cases and rulings, to help employers resolve some of the gray areas. Some of the factors on the list include: training; set hours of work; payment by the hour, week or month; furnishing tools or materials; doing work on the employer’s premises and payment of business expenses.

For example, if you require a worker to go through a training class before commencing work or to use particular tools or materials you provide, your worker would qualify as an employee. Similarly, if you request the worker be on site at the company headquarters from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day, the worker is an employee, not an independent contractor.

The overarching theme regarding the factors on the IRS’s list is that an employer has the right to control how an employee produces his or her work. When hiring an independent contractor, the employer gives up this control. The 20-factor list has helped many employers create a baseline to evaluate the role of their hires in order to avoid misclassification.

In 1996, the IRS took the list a step further by identifying three broad categories of evidence to be used in discriminating between an employee and an independent contractor. The three categories are behavioral control, financial control and relationship of the parties.

Employers can only minimally regulate contractors’ behavior. Contractors have the freedom to subcontract the work they receive, to complete the work in the way they feel is most efficient and to set their own hours and work location.

Financial control means that a contractor’s payment standard is based on a per task or piece work pay. The amount of time and energy contractors expend on the work they produce is up to the contractors, not their employers. In contrast, employees are typically paid an hourly wage or a salary, which their employers monitor and control, along with the number of hours they work. Employees also might receive additional benefits such as health coverage or retirement plans, which independent contractors do not receive.

An employer has the right to control how an employee produces his or her work. When hiring an independent contractor, the employer GIVES UP CONTROL.

The third category, relationship of the parties, refers to the increasingly common practice of employers requiring employees to sign non-compete clauses or non-disclosure agreements. Generally, independent contractors are not required to sign such legal contracts. Contractors can work with multiple clients if they so choose—even competing companies. You don’t have the right to control other relationships an independent contractor may have.

Pros and Cons of Contractors and Employees
An independent contractor might be a good fit if you don’t have the resources or manpower to pay, monitor or effectively use an employee regularly. You might simply need someone to complete projects on an occasional basis. For example, you might need someone to design a website for your company and occasionally help troubleshoot issues with the site. Once the site is up and running, the designer would not be needed day to day. In contrast, if you need to maintain close supervision and have a worker available on a regular schedule, hiring an employee would be the right decision. If you need a receptionist, it is impractical to let him/her decide when and where he or she will work. Nor would the arrangement pass muster with the IRS.

There are also administrative matters to consider. Employers are responsible for withholding the appropriate tax from their employees’ paychecks. Independent contractors are responsible for paying the tax themselves. Generally, employers are responsible for providing a Form 1099 to contractors to report their income on Schedule C of their personal income tax returns, for annual income above $600. However, the legal burden for keeping accurate records falls on the contractor.

Employers should also consider the cost of benefits. Implementation of the Affordable Care Act will have an impact. The ACA requires employers with more than fifty fulltime employees to provide health insurance. Hiring contractors, if they’re legitimate, is one way to avoid that threshold. In addition, many employers provide employees access to 401(k) plans or profit-sharing plans. These benefits are generally not extended to independent contractors.

So is it better to hire independent contractors or employees? It depends. Independent contractors can be more cost-effective and relieve the employer of some administrative and managerial burdens. On the other hand, with an employee you retain control of his work schedule and how the work is to be completed. Some positions are more appropriately filled by one type of worker or the other. Some positions come down to the preferences of the parties involved.

Both employees and contractors can become long-term assets that will help your business thrive. But make sure you’re meeting the letter and spirit of the law if you decide to go the contractor route.

About Melinda Kibler 1 Article
Melinda Kibler is a financial planner in Palisades Hudson Financial Group’s Fort Lauderdale office who counsels small-business owners. (Palisades Hudson also has offices in Scarsdale, N.Y.; Portland, Ore.; and Atlanta.) She is a graduate of the University of Rochester and holds the Certified Financial Planner (CFP®) certification. She can be reached at Melinda@ palisadeshudson.com.

7 Comments

  1. Your employment status affects many issues such as employment benefits, tax inference, and legal responsibility. If you are accepting a job offer to be an independent contractor, you should know some of the key differences.

  2. Its so hard finding a good contractor fit. I purposely didn?t go with the lowest offers because I wanted quality. Obviously that is a bogus measure and you can never be positive about what you?re going to get until the work is complete. It makes a lot of sense to do pre screening and make sure all of the reviews are good!

  3. Your article was full of useful information for business owners and potential employees. And you are correct in your assessments of when to use part-time and project-based employees.

  4. Though it’s hard to find the good contractors nowadays. But everybody should appoint the best contractors if you want good quality for a work. Melinda, your article is really useful for every business owners. You show the good information between employee and contractor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


CommentLuv badge