Another recent scientist’s death has resurfaced and fallen under question, as it bears a
similar pattern of circumstances that were present in the death or disappearance of other
scientists involved in advanced research fields.
The 2022 death of Amy Eskridge has now resurfaced online as the 11th case in a growing list
of scientists who either died or disappeared under mysterious circumstance.
The 10 other cases involved individuals tied to U.S. military, nuclear and aerospace
research.
Federal officials have sat up and taken notice, including President Donald Trump, who held
a private meeting on the issue last Thursday, calling the situation “pretty serious” and told
reporters, “I hope it’s random, but we’re going to know in the next week and a half.”
Later, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took to X with the following statement:
“In light of the recent and legitimate questions about these troubling cases and President
Trump’s commitment to the truth, the White House is actively working with all relevant
agencies and the FBI to holistically review all of the cases together and identify any
potential commonalities that may exist,” Leavitt said.
While officials have not confirmed any connection between the cases, the individual’s ties
to advance research fields and the overlap of each case have drawn public attention and
speculation.
Eskridge died in 2022, at the age of 34, in Huntsville, Alabama, reportedly from a self-
inflicted gunshot wound. Limited official details have been released publicly.
Eskridge co-founded the Institute for Exotic Science with her father, Richard Eskridge, a
retired NASA engineer, and described her work as focused on “antigravity” research, or so-
called experimental propulsion concepts. In a 2020 interview with YouTuber Jeremy Rys,
Eskridge was frank with what her line of research had wrought onto her life:
“We discovered antigravity, and our lives went to _____, and people started sabotaging us.
It’s harassment, its threats, it’s awful.”
Eskridge added, “If you stick your neck out in public, at least someone notices if your head
gets chopped off. If you stick your neck out in private, they will bury you. They will burn
down your house while you sleep in your bed, and it won’t even make the news.”
Eskridge also claimed that she needed to continue publishing, as the situation would just
get “more and more aggressive” towards those scientists working in the public domain,
particularly those working on unconventional technologies. She claimed that she saw a
pattern in which scientists who reported breakthroughs would “disappear” from public
work or stop publishing.
Eskridge also claimed that Huntsville was a hotbed for national security, intelligence and
aerospace technology, and a high priority target for so-called ‘first strike’ attack threats.
She alleged she was targeted by Russian operatives, including being passively monitored,
and even physically stalked.
It is worth noting that her father dismissed all the conspiracy theories about her death
being connected to a covert government research project, going as far as to tell
NewsNation that there was “nothing suspicious” about it, and that “scientists die also, just
like other people.”
Still, physicist and science communicator Michio Kaku has stated that the growing number
of scientists who have died or gone missing should be treated as a national security issue,
rather than isolated incidences. He stated to Fox News Digital that the clustering of cases
involving scientists with access to sensitive research is unprecedented and warrants
coordinated government scrutiny.
Kaku maintains that a single disappearance does not indicate a broader threat, but a
pattern involving multiple individuals with advanced security clearances raises the stakes.
Many of the cases involved work in high security fields of nuclear technology, classified
defense research and aerospace systems—all areas tightly protective because of their
strategic importance to national defense.
Among the most prominent on the list of missing or dead scientists is retired Major General
William Neal McCasland, 68, who was last seen at his home in Albuquerque, NM, in late
February. Though retired for more than 12 years, McCasland’s disappearance sparked
significant online speculation about potential connections to classified military programs
and UFOs because of his past role as the commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory
on the Wright-Patterson Air Force base. He is one of four former or current employees at
sensitive sites who’ve gone missing in New Mexico over roughly the last year.
While the FBI has stepped up their involvement in the investigation, it is officially described
as a “developing situation” by the Bureau. The Department of Energy, which oversees
NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory, is investigating the
case.
Current and former Energy Department officials do acknowledge the case as “eyebrow
raising”, though one former staffer states they have seen no evidence of any link in these
cases.
The facilities in question combined employ more than 20,000 people, many of whom work
in administrative and support roles and do not have access to sensitive information.
“The deaths and missing persons cases are scattered across several years at different and
only loosely affiliated organizations,” said Joseph Rodgers, the deputy director of the
Project on Nuclear Issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “If all of the
scientists were working on one project or weapons system, then I’d be more suspicious.”
As for McCasland, he left his home in February without his phone, any wearable devices or
his prescription glasses. Reportedly, all he had was his wallet, hiking boots and a .38
caliber revolver.
Search and rescue teams led by the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office and aided by state
and federal agencies deployed drones and K-9 units, all yielding no trace of him.
Online speculation swirled that McCasland was taken against his will because of his
consulting work for a non-government group that was probing the government’s UFO files.
His wife, however, acknowledged that he had a brief association with that community, but
dismissed any notion that his disappearance was in connection with it.
As for Eskridge, there is no publicly available evidence linking her death to either
McCasland’s disappearance or any of the other documented cases, and authorities have
not indicated any connection between her work and the circumstances of her death.
Be the first to comment