I have bought companies. I have also sold companies, and built others from nothing into businesses that did more than NT$2 billion in cumulative e-commerce revenue over more than a decade, at times running teams of more than 200 people. Across all of that, one pattern shows up so consistently that I now think most owners are solving succession planning as the wrong kind of problem. They treat it as a legal and financial event to arrange later, usually when they are already tired or already looking for an exit. As a buyer, I learned that the real work is operational, and it starts years before anyone talks about a transaction.
Here is what I mean. When I looked at a business to acquire, I was not primarily trying to verify what it had earned. I was trying to find out whether the business could keep earning that if the owner disappeared for a month. Most could not, and the reasons were almost never hidden or dramatic. They were small, daily habits that had quietly become load-bearing.
The clearest sign was decisions that waited for the owner. Not big strategic calls, but ordinary ones: whether to approve a return, whether to give a customer a discount, whether a supplier’s late delivery was acceptable this one time. In a healthy, transferable business, these decisions get made by someone other than the founder, using rules everyone already knows. In an owner-dependent business, they sit in a queue until the owner has time, or they get decided differently depending on the owner’s mood that day. Either way, the business is running on one person’s availability rather than on a system.
The second sign was relationships. Almost every owner I met had a handful of customers or suppliers who, in practice, only trusted them personally. That loyalty is real and it is valuable, but it is also fragile in a specific way: it does not transfer. If the future of the account depends on a phone call from the owner, then what a buyer is actually acquiring is a temporary bridge, not a durable asset. The same is true internally. If only the owner knows why a particular customer gets special terms, or which supplier will bend on price and which will not, that knowledge lives in one skull and disappears the day that person stops showing up.
The third sign, and the one I paid the most attention to, was pricing and exceptions that existed only in the owner’s head. Every business has a price list, and every business also has a shadow list of who gets what exception and why. When that shadow list is written down, even loosely, a new manager can apply it consistently and a buyer can trust it will keep working. When it is not written down, it is not really a policy. It is a memory, and memories leave with the person who holds them.
None of this shows up as a single dramatic flaw. It shows up as a quiet ceiling on value. A business that depends on its owner is worth something to that owner, because they can keep running it exactly the way they always have. It is worth much less to anyone else, because the buyer is not just purchasing revenue, they are purchasing the ability to keep that revenue coming without the one person who currently makes it possible.
The useful part of this, and the reason I think owners in their fifties should hear it now rather than near retirement, is that the fix does not have to be dramatic either. It is a gradual habit of moving what only you know out of your head and into something your team can follow without calling you first: a short written note on how exceptions get approved, a clear rule for who can say yes to a discount, an introduction that hands a key relationship to someone else on your team while you are still there to make it stick. None of this requires a lawyer or an accountant, and none of it is legal, tax, estate, or financial advice. It is simply the operational groundwork that has to exist before any of those conversations can matter. What I have also found is that this same work, done for no other reason than to make a business transferable someday, tends to make it noticeably easier and calmer to run today, because fewer things depend on you being in the room.
I want to be honest about the limits of this view: I am describing what made a business easier to buy, not a complete plan for succession, and every business has particulars mine has not encountered (https://xmy.tw/en/about).
Be the first to comment